Home Blog Page 75

How Kikwete and Kofi Annan Midwifed Kenya’s Fragile Peace

0

By James Okoth

Kenya once stood on the brink. The streets were burning, churches were smouldering, and neighbours had turned against each other. From Kisumu to Eldoret, from Naivasha to Kibera, the country long hailed as East Africa’s pillar of stability had fallen into darkness. It was early 2008 — and the disputed presidential election of December 2007 had torn the nation apart.

On one side stood Mwai Kibaki, the incumbent president, hurriedly sworn in at dusk inside State House. On the other was Raila Amolo Odinga, the people’s choice, crying foul and calling for justice after what his supporters saw as a stolen election. The violence that followed scarred the nation — more than 1,000 lives lost, over half a million displaced, and a nation’s soul shaken.

Then came the men and women who would rewrite Kenya’s fate — Kofi Annan, the late UN Secretary-General, Benjamin Mkapa, the former Tanzanian president, and Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete, then President of Tanzania, who brought to the table a calm hand and a compassionate heart.

As chair of the African Union, Kikwete played the quiet mediator, the bridge between tempers and reason. His diplomacy was marked by empathy and subtle firmness. He spoke to hearts more than he argued with minds. At one tense moment, when talks seemed doomed, he told the two Kenyan leaders, “History will not remember who won this election; it will remember who saved Kenya.”

At the negotiation table, positions were entrenched. Amos Wako, the Attorney General, served as Kibaki’s chief legal adviser, tasked with interpreting how much the constitution could bend without breaking. Across the room, James Orengo, sharp and fiery, stood in Raila Odinga’s corner, guarding the opposition’s position against tokenism.

The talks dragged on. Every word of the draft agreement was contested. Every comma carried political weight. The country held its breath. The dead were still being buried, the displaced still sleeping in camps, and the economy was bleeding.

The stalemate came down to one issue: the structure of power. Raila demanded that the Prime Minister’s position be anchored in the Constitution, arguing that only a legally protected role would prevent betrayal. Kibaki preferred a temporary executive arrangement, inserted by statute and dissolved once calm returned.

Kofi Annan, seeing the talks deteriorate, took a bold step. Together with Kikwete, he quietly requested that all aides, lawyers, and advisers leave the room. Only Kibaki and Raila remained — two men, once allies, now adversaries, staring at each other across a small table in an undisclosed hotel room.

For hours, they argued, listened, paused, and argued again. Voices were raised, tempers flared — but at some point, exhaustion gave way to understanding. They spoke not as politicians, but as patriots who realized that the nation’s survival depended on them. When they emerged, the tone had changed.

The agreement that followed — the National Accord of February 28, 2008 — birthed the Grand Coalition Government. Kibaki remained President. Raila became Prime Minister, heading half the Cabinet. Kenya had been pulled back from the edge.

Through it all, Jakaya Kikwete remained the steady hand and the calm conscience. He guided, listened, and soothed. He was the moral buffer between egos — the one who could speak truth gently and still be heard.

And over time, out of that storm of diplomacy, grew a friendship. What began as formal engagement between leaders became a bond of brotherhood between two men — Kikwete and Raila Odinga.

Years later, when Raila breathed his last, Kikwete’s grief was personal. He mourned not a political ally, but a man he had come to call family. Standing before mourners in Bondo, Kikwete’s voice trembled as he recalled the peace talks, saying that Raila was not just a Kenyan statesman, but a son of Africa whose courage and honesty transcended borders.

To Tanzania, Kikwete said, Raila was “the most Tanzanian of Kenyans” — a man who could cross the border and be received as a brother, not a guest. And to Kenya, Kikwete himself remains the bridge that joined two nations, carrying the warmth of Dar es Salaam to the political cold of Nairobi, a reminder that peace is always possible when humility meets courage.

The Grand Coalition may have been born of crisis, but it was sustained by compassion — by men like Kikwete, who believed that diplomacy is not about who speaks the loudest, but who listens longest.

As Kofi Annan once said, “Kenya’s peace was not negotiated on paper; it was negotiated in the human heart.”

And it was Kikwete, more than anyone else, who kept that heart beating — a true statesman whose friendship with Raila Odinga outlived politics, and whose legacy will forever bind Kenya and Tanzania in brotherhood.

When the Dignity of the Deceased Is Stolen at Burials

0

By James

There was a time when funerals in Kenya were sacred — moments of silence, sobs, and solemn reflection. Villages gathered not to shout slogans but to console the bereaved, to honour the dead, and to celebrate a life lived. That time, sadly, is fading fast.

Today, funerals have become political arenas — loud, chaotic, and sometimes criminal. The dignity of the deceased is being stolen in broad daylight by crowds that come not to mourn, but to perform. Across Homa Bay and Siaya counties, funerals are increasingly turning into theatres of disruption, theft, and disorder.

The rise of hired mourners has made the situation worse. Politicians, eager to project influence, now bus in groups of rowdy supporters to funerals. Their mission is not to grieve, but to clap, cheer, and chant. In their wake, confusion reigns. Purses are snatched, phones vanish, and heartfelt eulogies are drowned in noise.

The recent chaos in Siaya County illustrates this moral decay vividly. Just hours after the burial of former Prime Minister Raila Amolo Odinga, his gravesite in Bondo was defiled by unknown individuals. The wreaths laid earlier that day were destroyed and scattered, leaving a scene of desecration rather than remembrance. To worsen the shame, during the burial itself, a firearm belonging to a governor’s security aide was grabbed in the confusion — and remains missing. What was meant to be a moment of national mourning turned into a display of disorder and disgrace.

A similar trend has been reported in Homa Bay, where politicians have complained of being robbed as mourners turn rowdy during speeches. For many genuine mourners, the line between grief and fear is now dangerously thin. Funerals — once spaces of comfort — have become places of chaos.

This degeneration is not just about bad manners; it is a moral crisis. A burial is not a political rally. A grave is not a podium. When leaders import rowdiness into moments of sorrow, they erode the cultural foundation that holds our communities together. The dead cannot defend themselves — and the least we owe them is respect.

County governments, security agencies, and the clergy must now act jointly to restore order at funerals. Major burials, especially those involving national or county figures, should have structured crowd management, controlled access, and a code of conduct that preserves dignity. Religious leaders must also reclaim their space — reminding mourners that the final journey of a soul is sacred, not a spectacle.

Communities, too, must resist this growing culture of hired grief. The tears of a people must remain genuine — not rehearsed, not purchased, and never manipulated for applause.

As an elder in Asembo remarked in sorrow, “When we turn tears into currency, we offend both the living and the dead. The graveyard must never be a marketplace.”

Let us restore dignity to our funerals. Let the dead rest in peace — and let the living mourn with honour.

Deep Politics: Kahiga’s Poisoned Politics and the Fire It Will Ignite

0

By James Okoth

There are moments in politics that expose not just poor judgment, but the complete decay of moral fabric. Nyeri Governor Mutahi Kahiga has just delivered one of those moments — standing before a cheering crowd and, in his Kikuyu dialect, uttering words so venomous that they will stain his political record forever.

“Ruto had focused so much on developing Nyanza region and forsaken the Mt. Kenya region — and because of that, God sent an angel of death and Raila died.”

That was Kahiga. Not in jest. Not in passing. But in a calculated, public pronouncement that mocked the death of a national icon and reduced divine justice to a tribal scorecard.

It was not politics — it was cruelty weaponized.

Raila Odinga’s death shook Kenya to its core. For millions, he was more than a politician; he was the soul of resistance, the man who bled for the freedoms Kahiga now abuses with his tongue. To suggest that God celebrated his death is to spit on decades of struggle, on the blood spilled for democracy, and on the dignity of a family still in mourning.

But Kahiga’s words did not slip by accident. They were a dog whistle — meant to stir ethnic bitterness, to provoke Luo anger, to rally the mountain through hatred rather than hope. Behind this calculated provocation lies a darker design: a political machine desperate to neutralize the emotional power surrounding Babu Owino’s meteoric rise and to fracture the Nairobi vote before 2027.

The scheme is simple but sinister — to paint the Luo resurgence as a threat, to bait outrage, and to create a rift big enough for their own candidate to slip through. But they’ve touched the wrong nerve.

Because the Luo community’s grief is sacred. Their history is steeped in the pain of loss — from Tom Mboya to Jaramogi, to the countless martyrs of political struggle. Every insult has only hardened their resolve. Kahiga’s words have not weakened them; they’ve united them.

Across the country, condemnation is pouring in. Even within Mount Kenya, there’s unease. Many know that mocking death is not courage — it’s cowardice. And they see through the ploy: a desperate man clutching at tribal straws to stay relevant in a changing Kenya.

If Kahiga hoped to win political ground, he has instead dug his own grave — not of soil, but of shame. His remarks have exposed the moral rot in a segment of leadership that confuses arrogance for authority and cruelty for political wit.

This isn’t just about Raila. It’s about the soul of Kenya’s politics — whether we will allow leaders to rise by desecrating the dead and dividing the living.

Kahiga’s words will echo in history, not as a statement of triumph, but as a lesson in how low politics can fall — and how swiftly a nation can rise in disgust against it.

Deep Politics: Kahiga’s Poisoned Politics and the Fire It Will Ignite

0

By James Okoth
There are moments in politics that expose not just poor judgement but the complete decay of moral fabric. Nyeri Governor Mutahi Kahiga has just delivered one of those moments — standing before a cheering crowd and, in his Kikuyu dialect, uttering words so venomous that they will stain his political record forever.

“Ruto had focused so much on developing the Nyanza region and forsaken the Mt Kenya region — and because of that, God sent an angel of death and Raila died.”

That was Kahiga. Not in jest. Not in passing. But in a calculated, public pronouncement that mocked the death of a national icon and reduced divine justice to a tribal scorecard.

It was not politics — it was cruelty weaponised.

Raila Odinga’s death shook Kenya to its core. For millions, he was more than a politician; he was the soul of resistance — the man who bled for the freedoms Kahiga now abuses with his tongue. To suggest that God celebrated his death is to spit on decades of struggle, on the blood spilled for democracy, and on the dignity of a family still in mourning.

But Kahiga’s words did not slip by accident. They were a dog whistle — meant to stir ethnic bitterness, to provoke Luo anger, to rally the mountain through hatred rather than hope. Behind this calculated provocation lies a darker design: a political machine desperate to neutralise the emotional power surrounding Babu Owino’s meteoric rise and to fracture the Nairobi vote before 2027.

The scheme is simple but sinister — to paint the Luo resurgence as a threat, to bait outrage, and to create a rift big enough for their own candidate to slip through. But they’ve touched the wrong nerve.

Because the Luo community’s grief is sacred. Their history is steeped in the pain of loss — from Tom Mboya to Jaramogi, to the countless martyrs of political struggle. Every insult has only hardened their resolve. Kahiga’s words have not weakened them; they’ve united them.

Across the country, condemnation is pouring in. Even within Mount Kenya, there is unease. Many know that mocking death is not courage — it is cowardice. And they see through the ploy: a desperate man clutching at tribal straws to stay relevant in a changing Kenya.

If Kahiga hoped to win political ground, he has instead dug his own grave — not of soil, but of shame. His remarks have exposed the moral rot in a segment of leadership that confuses arrogance for authority and cruelty for political wit.

This isn’t just about Raila. It’s about the soul of Kenya’s politics — whether we will allow leaders to rise by desecrating the dead and dividing the living.

Kahiga’s words will echo in history, not as a statement of triumph, but as a lesson in how low politics can fall — and how swiftly a nation can rise in disgust against it.

AFTER BABA RAILA ODINGA, WHAT NEXT FOR ODM

0

By Prof Peter Okoth

I guess that this is the question many are struggling with currently. Yes — but why? The answer is simple: it takes a giant to create a political colossus, the kind that Baba Raila created. Raila Amolo Odinga wasn’t just a name — and that is what is confusing many.

Raila was a political student of his father, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, President Jomo Kenyatta, Tom Mboya, and many other leaders from pre-independence to the present day. He travelled the world and understood global politics, and knew many global politicians personally — and how they governed their countries.

He knew the Kenyan struggle for independence and understood what brought independence to Kenya. He knew hate because he suffered it and was abhorrent of it. He persuaded his political enemies to walk the middle ground and have the country’s interest as the guiding principle to guide decisions.

He knew that political competition is real and was always prepared for it. He learnt how to dust his coat and move on after a bruising political contest. He knew that elections were necessary in any democracy and that there would always be winners and losers. The end should never be bloody.

He was calculated and always took a path whose end he followed to completion.

Raila knew how his birthplace denied him the presidency — utter discrimination without any justification, despite everyone else knowing the truth. He was a master mobiliser and a friend of many, both young and old. He helped many through their education and political journey. He gave more to other communities than his own and, apart from being a Pan-Africanist, was also an ardent nationalist.

These values form the guiding principles that should steer the ODM Party — not raw hatred nor unfounded rhetoric about this or that leader. Raila knew that it took time to learn government and governance, and that only when ready could a leader govern a country into prosperity.

Presidents Uhuru Kenyatta and William Samoei Ruto realised that Raila was a good political father figure and a great mentor. ODM must find a person or a group of people dedicated to its success through active conversation and collective reasoning for the common good and in the interests of the people.

Like all political parties, it must have its grassroots support bases guarded and protected. This is realised through engagement and consensus building on issues and by whoever represents those people and their interests.

Lastly, every political party wants to govern and win power. Their vision and mission for the country must be based on the needs of the people, and more so for the youth: give them education and jobs. Create industries in every county that offer employment to more than one million people every year. Give them affordable and functional health systems. Make clean water available.

It must be understood that ODM is a political organ and not an administrative institution. Yes indeed — it requires structures and systems, but those are supported by human charisma and character. Every leader must know that they have more responsibility than personal interests.

The human beings left in ODM must use Raila’s language and syntax the same way they do in Tanzania with Mwalimu Kambarage Julius Nyerere. Otherwise, any institution could be branded as a political party and attract political support — but this only happens in textbooks.

What we should do is write a concise, small, thin reference compendium on Raila’s perceptions of certain issues that everyone who wants to lead a political party should learn from. The entire ODM body should always remain alive to those tenets and values.

I like what CS Mbadi said at the funeral of Baba: there is a Joshua out here, and there are Aarons amongst those left behind. It might be difficult to know who they are today, but time shall allow it to happen organically and depending on need.

Most important of all — gather all, scatter none.

Will the Mbeere Community Benga Maestro, Karish, Sing His Way to Parliament?

0

By Anderson Ojwang

In the Mbeere community, his songs soothe souls and give hope to the hopeless.
In his song, Kimulu (lantern), the symbol of his party lights the region.
In him, they converge and dance with vigour, anticipating a better day ahead.
In markets and social places, his voice speaks to the masses, and the words carry them along.
Even the bravest and most cunning fall to his drum beats and the rhythm of his music.

In Embu County, he is the king and the father of the community’s traditional music — the voice of the voiceless.
The speaker, listener, and healer of grieving hearts — the voice that carries their sorrow and happiness deep into the mountain.

Newton Karish, the Democratic Party (DP) parliamentary candidate, is not a pushover. The Benga maestro sings to the heart of the community.
Through his music, he forced the self-declared leader of Mt Kenya, former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, to patiently pay attention to his Democracy for the Citizens Party slogan “Sikiza Ground.”

Indeed, Gachagua listened to the ground, and after a sponsored opinion poll placed Karish at 43 percent, DCP at 20 percent, and UDA at 18 percent, he threw in the towel and rallied behind the DP candidate.

Karish, the immediate former Muminji Ward Member of the County Assembly (MCA), in the 2022 general elections left a mark after he won in all the polling stations in the ward — a mark of trust and faith by the electorate.
In his music, they danced to the polling station and spoke through the ballot — a resounding victory it was.

Head of Campaigns, Mr Sammy Njiru, says through music, Karish’s popularity has grown beyond the mountain, and his contribution to nurturing upcoming musicians from the community has endeared him to the locals.

“Karish is the father of Mbeere community music. He is the voice of the community. His music soothes and appeals to the community. In his music, the community gets its identity. That is why he is liked and so popular with the voters,” he says.

Njiru says the DP candidate, in his manifesto, has four agendas for the community — education, health, agriculture, and roads.

He says Karish has been the MCA for the ward for the last three terms and was first elected councillor in a by-election after the 2007 general elections.

“In 1997, in his 20s, Karish had declared interest in contesting for a parliamentary seat in the area. But when the former Attorney General JB Muturi declared interest in the same seat, he stepped down in his favour. For him, Muturi was his political father and he could not face him at the ballot,” he says.

Njiru says in 1997, Karish’s popularity had grown because of his music, and he was one of the strongest candidates then, but out of respect, stepped down for JB.

“Karish carries the aspirations of the DP party, and the by-election is ours to lose. This seat was previously held by our member, Geoffrey Kiringa Ruku, before he was appointed Cabinet Secretary for Public Service,” he says.

Ruku was appointed to the seat after President William Ruto sacked Muturi from the Cabinet position.

For Muturi, the by-election presents an opportunity to square it with President Ruto — once an ally turned bitter political rival.

For Ruto, he wants a second win over Muturi to showcase his political superiority and might over his former Attorney General — proving that he remains the king of the mountain even after their fallout.

And for the Deputy President, Prof Abraham Kithure Kindiki, it is a test of his life — whether he can be relied upon to deliver the 2027 mountain votes to President Ruto.

The candidates are Karish; Chama Cha Kazi (CCK) hopeful Duncan Mbui, who also recently served as the Evurore Ward MCA; and UDA candidate Leonard Muthende.

Muthende enjoys government backing, while Karish, the renowned Benga maestro turned politician, is banking on his performance track record — having served as Muminji MCA for three consecutive terms — and the support of seasoned politicians Muturi and Lenny Kivuti, who are backing him.

On the other hand, Mbui is banking on the number of votes in his Evurore Ward, which he has served as MCA for two terms. Given that it is the most populous ward in the constituency, this could tilt the scales in his favour.

Other candidates who have been cleared to vie include Lawrence Ireri, Isaac Muringi, Albert Ngari, Daniel Ngari, Reuben Njeru, and Simon Waiharo.

Mwanga Re-Ignites Fight with Governor Orengo over Alleged “Stolen Victory in 2007 ODM Primary”

0
CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v80), quality = 82

By Reporter

Former Ugenya parliamentary candidate Stephen Okoth Mwanga has re-ignited an age-long political rivalry with Siaya Governor James Orengo over what he alleged as “his stolen victory.”

Mwanga claimed that in the 2007 elections, his victory in the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) primary for Ugenya Constituency was stolen from him and handed over to Orengo.

“It is an open secret that I won the ODM nomination for Ugenya, but the party denied me victory. They preferred Orengo over me. It was the highest level of betrayal,” he said.

Mwanga said Orengo has no moral authority to speak over what he alleged as the “stolen victory” of the former Prime Minister, the late Raila Odinga, in the 2017 presidential election.

Orengo, on Sunday during the burial of Raila at his Kango ka Jaramogi home in Bondo, stunned mourners when he claimed Raila’s victory was stolen in the 2017 presidential election.

“Raila was a fighter for justice and democracy. There are those who forget the legacy of Raila Amolo Odinga. I remember after the elections in 2017, when his votes were stolen, and we must continue to say that. Raila decided with a few of us that he was going to be sworn in as a people’s president at Uhuru Park,” he remarked at the burial.

Mwanga said it was unfortunate that Orengo claimed Raila had been rigged out, yet he was a beneficiary of the same system.

“Politicians should stop playing to the public gallery. Ask yourself if you are clean before you can throw punches. It is very sad. I am a victim of the rigging system and saddened when I see beneficiaries claim sainthood,” he said.

Mwanga conducted one of the high-voltage campaigns in Ugenya then, flying to rallies in choppers and supporting orphans, widows, and the vulnerable.

He became the Ugenya MP that never was after he was rigged out and has since taken a low profile in local politics.

Uhuru and Raila: The Blood Relationship Kenyans Never Knew

0

By James Okoth

When former President Uhuru Kenyatta rose to speak at Nyayo Stadium during the state funeral of Raila Amolo Odinga, the crowd expected politics — but what they got was something deeper.

He began softly, his voice thick with emotion. Then, in a moment that melted the tension of grief, he quipped;

“Saa ingine tukiwa tumetulia kidogo hapo, tulikuwa tunapewa kakitu kidogo na Raila… Mimi kakitu kidogo nasema ni chai ama uji. (Sometimes during our quiet moments, Raila would offer us something small… and by that I mean tea or porridge.)”

The stadium erupted in laughter, but beneath the humour was a truth few had ever known — that Uhuru and Raila shared more than politics; they shared friendship, familiarity, and fraternity.

For a nation that had long viewed the two as bitter rivals, that simple mention of uji unveiled the human bond behind decades of public drama — a relationship of bloodlines and brotherhood that stretched back to Kenya’s founding fathers.

Long before politics pitted them against each other, Uhuru Kenyatta and Raila Odinga were children of Kenya’s most influential families — heirs to dynasties that shaped the nation’s destiny.

Their fathers — Jomo Kenyatta, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, and Tom Mboya — were the towering architects of independence. They shared dinners, debates, and dreams of a new nation. Their homes were open to one another; their children, playmates in the elite circle of postcolonial Nairobi.

Raila and Uhuru, both educated in privilege but tempered by public expectation, grew up within the same social orbit.
They met at national family gatherings, political functions, and at times in the private spaces of their parents’ homes. Raila would later recall how the Kenyatta family was often in touch with the Odingas during the early post-independence years, when their fathers — Jomo and Jaramogi — still called each other brother.

At State House and in the Odinga homestead in Kisumu, laughter, not hostility, once ruled. The young boys — Uhuru, Raila, and even the children of Tom Mboya — saw one another as part of the same Kenya their fathers were building.
It was, for a brief moment, a golden age of unity among Kenya’s political dynasties.

But politics, as history would have it, tore that fraternity apart.

Jaramogi once refused to take the presidency in 1963, famously declaring that “no independence is real until Kenyatta is free.” But years later, he fell out with the very man he had lifted.
The Kenyatta–Odinga fallout of the 1960s left a wound that ran deeper than politics — it divided two families once bound by friendship.

Decades later, fate would circle back.
The children of those two men — Uhuru and Raila — would inherit both the rivalry and the responsibility to heal it.
They were destined, it seemed, to either continue the quarrel of their fathers or to finally end it.

Their journey was anything but linear.

In 2002, Raila Odinga’s dramatic declaration — “Kibaki Tosha!” — at Uhuru Park redrew Kenya’s political map.
At that moment, he endorsed Mwai Kibaki over Uhuru Kenyatta, splitting KANU and ending the Moi succession plan.
It was a betrayal that stung the young Uhuru deeply and set the stage for years of rivalry.

They would face off again in 2013 and 2017, each election more bruising than the last. Court battles, protests, and rhetoric widened the divide.
To many Kenyans, Uhuru and Raila symbolised the endless cycle of antagonism that defined the country’s politics.

On the steps of Harambee House, they stunned the nation. Their clasp was more than a gesture of peace; it was a moment of lineage reconciliation — the symbolic reunion of the Kenyatta and Odinga bloodlines.
From that moment, their relationship evolved from competition to companionship.
Uhuru began calling Raila “my brother.” Raila referred to him as “ndugu yangu.”

Together they embarked on the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI) — a bold experiment in redefining inclusion, unity, and governance.

Those close to the two men speak of quiet, private moments the public never saw.

Uhuru would occasionally drop by Raila’s Karen home without cameras or aides. Raila, in turn, would visit the Kenyatta residence in Gatundu or Nairobi to check on his “younger brother.”
They shared stories, laughter, and — as Uhuru fondly revealed — cups of uji.

It was a friendship grounded in mutual respect and an understanding that history had handed them both the same burden: to heal what their fathers’ generation broke.

Uhuru once joked, during his eulogy, that he and Raila often wondered what their fathers — Jomo and Jaramogi — might be discussing in the afterlife.

“I told him,” Uhuru said, smiling through tears, “those two must still be arguing about politics like us.”

That candid remark revealed what no analyst could capture — a human bond, forged not by politics, but by shared destiny.

When Raila Odinga died, it was Uhuru — not a sitting official — who lingered longest after the burial in Bondo.

He arrived quietly, without the presidential motorcade that once followed him, and walked alone toward the grave.
Witnesses say he stood there for nearly half an hour — head bowed, lips moving in silent prayer — before kneeling to touch the red earth.

He did not speak to the cameras. He didn’t have to. His silence was eloquent enough.
It told a story of a man mourning not just a comrade, but a brother bound by history.

Uhuru and Raila, both sons of privilege and pain, carried the weight of Kenya’s contradictions.
One represented power; the other, resistance.
Yet in their later years, they came to represent something greater — reconciliation.

Their partnership blurred tribal boundaries that had long divided Kenya’s politics.
The Kikuyu and the Luo, once set apart by their fathers’ fallout, now watched their sons walk together.

In their twilight, they taught the nation that peace is not the absence of rivalry — it is the maturity to rise above it.

Kenyans spent decades watching them clash — in rallies, courts, and ballot boxes — never realising that behind the scenes they shared laughter, stories, and uji.

History, in its irony, waited until Raila’s death to reveal the depth of that kinship.
What began as political rivalry ended as blood reconciliation — not by lineage, but by legacy.

In death, Raila reminded the world of their brotherhood.
In grief, Uhuru proved it.

And as he walked away from the grave, a gust of wind lifted red dust into the sky — as though Jomo and Jaramogi, wherever they sat, finally nodded in agreement.

Edwin Sifuna: The Red T-Shirt of Defiance

0

By James Okoth

He stood among mourners dressed in black — the tailored suits, designer shades, and polished grief.
Yet Edwin Sifuna arrived in startling simplicity: a red unbranded, unironed T-shirt, light beige trousers, and a branded ODM cap tilted lightly over tear-drenched eyes.
It was a look that said little but meant everything.

In a crowd choreographed in ceremonial mourning, Sifuna’s outfit was rebellion in plain cloth.
Not rebellion against Baba, but against the theatre the funeral had become.
Where others came adorned for farewell, he came clothed in conviction — mourning a leader, not performing loss.

The red T-shirt glowed against the muted tones around him — raw, emotional, unfinished — just like the struggle Raila Odinga had left behind.
Unironed, it bore the wrinkles of truth.
Unbranded, it carried the honesty of purpose.
Red — the colour of courage, sacrifice, and the restless heartbeat of a movement unwilling to die.

When Sifuna rose to speak at Opoda Farm, the air thick with politics disguised as condolence, his T-shirt had already delivered the preface to his message.
He did not flatter, nor did he soften. He spoke as one who had walked with truth too long to pretend otherwise.

“If there’s one thing Baba taught us,” he began, his voice steady yet scarred by emotion,
“it is that the struggle must live beyond him. You don’t honour Raila by folding the flag; you honour him by raising it higher.”

The crowd stirred — unsure whether to cheer or stay silent.
Around him sat party dignitaries already embracing the new era of “broad-based government,” exchanging loyalty for relevance.
But Sifuna, dressed in rebellion and mourning at once, would not yield.

“We cannot pretend that the struggle ended with Raila,” he continued.
“It would be betrayal to turn ODM into a souvenir of the past. The movement must outlive the man.”

It was a brave sermon delivered in the temple of conformity.
And as his words cut through the polite applause, he stood there — the only man unarmoured by fabric or fear.

That red T-shirt was more than attire; it was metaphor.
In it was the residue of struggle, the hue of protest, the pulse of ODM’s founding fire.
It was the colour of unfinished revolutions — of nights spent in police cells, of rallies charged with purpose, of Raila’s unyielding political spirit.

His branded ODM cap crowned the defiance, completing a look that balanced grief with grit.
Together, the red and the beige spoke softly but firmly — that Sifuna came not to mourn the movement’s leader into silence, but to remind the living that silence is betrayal.

As one senior official whispered that Sifuna “was isolating himself from the new reality,” others saw in him the last echo of authenticity — the man who refused to let grief be used as a curtain for compromise.

When the speeches ended and the politicians drifted towards the marquees of power, Sifuna’s image lingered — the lone mourner in red, eyes swollen, shoulders straight.
He had dressed not for ceremony but for conscience.
He had mourned not in formality, but in truth.

His T-shirt was creased; his loyalty was not.
In a day drenched with scripted tributes and carefully measured tears, he remained the honest punctuation at the end of a long political sentence.
He mourned differently — and in doing so, he reminded Kenya that even rebellion can be reverent.

In the hours and days after the funeral, murmurs rippled through ODM’s inner circles.
Some senior figures, eager to align with the emerging “broad-based” government, hinted that Sifuna’s tone was “divisive” — even warning that his posturing could threaten his position as Secretary-General.

But for the younger wing of ODM — the idealists who grew up chanting “Chungwa Moja!” — Sifuna’s stand was not defiance; it was doctrine.
He had spoken what many whispered: that the party risked losing its soul while chasing seats at the high table.

Now, he stands at a dangerous intersection — between loyalty to the late Raila Odinga’s ideals and the pragmatic pull of survival in post-Raila politics.
If he bends, he keeps his title. If he holds, he may lose it — but gain history’s respect.

In the end, the red T-shirt may come to symbolise more than mourning — it may mark the rebirth of conviction in a party at risk of forgetting its colour.
For on that day in Opoda, Sifuna did not just wear red; he became it — bold, unyielding, and unwilling to fade.

ORPHANS: The Children of Raila’s Political House

0

By James Okoth

When the soil closed over Raila Amolo Odinga at Opoda Farm, it did more than bury a man — it sealed the era of Kenya’s most prolific political tutor.
Across the political divide, men and women who had once found both purpose and protection under his shadow stood exposed — no longer protégés, but orphans in a political wilderness.

The country watched as disciples without a patriarch looked at each other with quiet confusion.
For decades, Raila was not just a political leader; he was a school. A movement.
A political seminary from which Kenya’s current and next generation of leaders graduated — some loyal, others prodigal.
Now, his absence has left them scrambling for identity, as though the very air of politics had thinned overnight.

The Architect and His Apprentices

No Kenyan politician has produced as many giants — and rivals — as Raila Odinga.
From William Ruto to Kalonzo Musyoka, Musalia Mudavadi, Eugene Wamalwa, Hassan Joho, Wycliffe Oparanya, Charity Ngilu, Anyang’ Nyong’o, James Orengo, Junet Mohamed, John Mbadi, Opiyo Wandayi, and Samuel Atandi, all passed through his crucible of political steel.
Each learnt the rhythm of defiance, the art of mass mobilisation, and the moral vocabulary of opposition from one man — Baba.

He taught them patience in betrayal, endurance in loss, and humility in victory — though few ever mastered all three.
To work with Raila was to be both forged and tested; to oppose him was to grow sharper, for he fought his enemies with strategy, not spite.

In a political landscape built on convenience, Raila raised conviction as currency.
He turned defeat into a doctrine and taught a nation to see losing as learning — a lesson that shaped Kenya’s democratic resilience itself.

Ruto — The Rebellious Son Who Learnt Strategy

Today, President William Ruto stands as perhaps Raila’s most successful graduate — though one who left the classroom early.
It was in the crucible of ODM that Ruto learnt the grammar of populism, the pulse of street politics, and the gospel of defiance.

The chants of “ODM! Tuko Tayari!” that once lifted Raila’s rallies in 2007 now echo in Ruto’s “Bottom-Up” crusades — different slogans, same soul.
Even his campaign theatrics — the direct connection with hustlers, the sense of siege against the elite — are dialects of Raila’s old language.
The teacher may be gone, but the student rules the republic.

And yet, at Raila’s funeral, when Ruto chanted “ODM!” and the crowd roared back, it wasn’t just nostalgia — it was the orphan’s tribute to the master who first showed him how to lead from the ground up.

Kalonzo — The Loyal Lieutenant Turned Custodian

Stephen Kalonzo Musyoka, ever the loyal lieutenant in Raila’s many coalitions, now finds himself at an existential crossroads.
For years, he was the bridge between Raila’s idealism and political reality — the one who patched cracks when tempers flared.
But with Raila gone, Kalonzo’s calm diplomacy suddenly feels lonely, almost antiquated in an age of loud populism.

He wept openly in Opoda, not just for the man but for the partnership that gave him relevance.
Kalonzo’s greatest fear is not losing political space — it’s losing ideological anchorage.
Without Raila’s moral compass, even the faithful risk wandering into transactional politics.

Mudavadi — The Pragmatist Who Learnt Timing

For Musalia Mudavadi, Raila was both rival and mirror.
He borrowed Raila’s calm but not his risk.
He learnt patience but not protest.
If Raila was fire, Mudavadi was ash — steady, surviving, but rarely sparking.

Under Raila’s mentorship in the early 2000s, Mudavadi found how to articulate reform in economic terms.
But his instinct for stability often kept him from the storms that made Raila a legend.
Now, with the elder gone, Mudavadi’s quiet diplomacy seems almost pale beside the roar of populism that defines Kenya’s next phase.

Still, as he sat by the graveside, head bowed, one sensed a man mourning the last true statesman of conviction — the only one who could unite Kenya’s contradictions and make peace sound revolutionary.

Joho and Oparanya — The Governors of Style and Substance

From the Coast to Western Kenya, two governors — Hassan Joho and Wycliffe Oparanya — embody Raila’s dual legacy: charisma and competence.
Joho inherited Raila’s flair for theatre; Oparanya, his discipline of numbers.
Joho’s sunglasses and speeches turned rallies into festivals of loyalty, while Oparanya’s spreadsheets gave ODM a reputation for managerial maturity.

But with Baba gone, both men find their political stage dimmed.
ODM was never just a party — it was a movement built around a heartbeat.
Without the heartbeat, the dance feels forced.

Their next chapters will determine whether they can transform inherited loyalty into independent leadership — or whether they, too, will fade into nostalgia.

Junet Mohamed — The Jester Who Became a Strategist

Junet Mohamed, once dismissed as Raila’s comic relief, quietly evolved into the bridge between the high table and the grassroots.
Behind the laughter was a mind honed in the fires of Raila’s political theatre.
He mastered the art of messaging — of turning complex ideology into memorable lines.

But Raila’s death leaves Junet suddenly voiceless, like an actor whose stage lights have gone out mid-performance.
He must now choose whether to remain the echo of a legend or reinvent himself as the strategist of a new ODM order — one less about personality, more about purpose.

John Mbadi — The Technocrat’s Burden

When John Mbadi was appointed the first Luo Cabinet Secretary for Finance, history smiled.
It was the ultimate vindication of Raila’s long fight to break ethnic ceilings in public leadership.
Mbadi’s discipline, intellect, and party loyalty had made him the embodiment of ODM’s technocratic side — steady, silent, strategic.

Now, with Raila gone, Mbadi carries not just a docket but a destiny.
He is expected to balance service to the Republic with loyalty to a fallen mentor’s ideals — a delicate dance that will define whether ODM’s reformist spirit survives in government corridors.

Opiyo Wandayi — The Engine That Must Now Drive Itself

Opiyo Wandayi, now Cabinet Secretary for Energy, was one of Raila’s most trusted organisational generals — a man who knew both the fire of the streets and the structure of Parliament.
He was the whip who held ODM together during storms of division, and the strategist who gave the movement intellectual muscle.

His appointment to Cabinet was Baba’s quiet endorsement of generational transition.
But with the patriarch gone, Wandayi must now learn to generate power — not just manage it.
Can he light the next phase of ODM’s journey, or will he, too, dim under the weight of compromise?

Samuel Atandi — The Defector in the Mirror

Then there is Samuel Atandi, the eloquent, youthful legislator who once wore Raila’s loyalty like a badge — only to now pledge allegiance to President Ruto.
His shift, symbolic and controversial, represents the fragmentation of ODM’s once-iron grip on Luo Nyanza.
To some, Atandi is a realist aligning with power; to others, a prodigal chasing convenience.

In him lies the reflection of a generation torn between ideology and opportunity — the orphans who find it easier to defect than to rebuild.
Yet, even in his defection, he carries traces of the master’s mentorship — the confidence, the cadence, the conviction — only redirected elsewhere.

Orengo and Nyong’o — The Intellectual Custodians

In the intellectual wing of the movement stood James Orengo and Prof. Anyang’ Nyong’o — men of letters and loyalty.
For them, Raila was not a politician but a philosopher of struggle.
He gave meaning to protest, dignity to dissent, and reason to risk.

At Opoda Farm, Orengo’s voice cracked as he said, “we are not just burying Raila; we are burying courage.”

That line captured the mood of an entire generation of reformists — now ageing, surrounded by political mercenaries who speak of reform but practise convenience.
The scholars of struggle now stand as curators of a fading gospel.

The Next Line — Orphans and Inheritors

Beyond the familiar names, a new crop of leaders — Winnie Odinga, Edwin Sifuna, Babu Owino, Gladys Wanga, Jeremiah Kioni, and others — stare at a different inheritance: a movement without its moral monarch.
They are the orphans of energy — restless, articulate, but unanchored.
Without Baba’s presence to calibrate the rhythm of protest, they risk mistaking noise for ideology, rebellion for reform.

For them, Raila’s death is both tragedy and test.
Will they carry forward the philosophy or merely perform it?
Will ODM become a think-tank of democracy or a relic of resistance?

The Political Republic of Orphans

In truth, Kenya itself feels politically orphaned.
For decades, Raila Odinga was the conscience of the Republic — the voice that called out excess, that legitimised opposition, that made power earn its place.
His absence exposes a vacuum not just in ODM, but in national moral leadership.

In every corner of politics, there are traces of his tutelage — in Ruto’s rhetoric, in Kalonzo’s alliances, in Mudavadi’s diplomacy, in Joho’s charisma, in Mbadi’s intellect, in Wandayi’s discipline, in Junet’s humour, and even in Atandi’s ambition.
But no one carries the whole.
Each holds a fragment of the gospel — none, the gospel itself.

The Sun Without Its Orbit

Raila Odinga did not just raise politicians; he raised Kenya’s political consciousness.
He was the sun around which orbits formed — some bright, others faint.
Now the sun has set, and the planets drift — luminous but lost, each seeking gravity of its own.

The orphans of Raila’s political house may one day find their voices again.
But for now, Kenya listens to an echo — the fading timbre of a man who taught a nation to speak truth to power, and power to conscience.

And when history writes of this moment, it will say: the teacher died, but the lesson refused to.