By Anderson Ojwang
Nyanza Professionals and Business Caucus have objected to the proposed Siaya nuclear power plant by the Nuclear Power and Energy Agency (NuPEA).
The group said, as independent professionals and on behalf of the communities living within and around the Lake Victoria basin, they object to the Government of Kenya’s pursuit of a Nuclear Power Program that has been outlined in the National Energy Policy 2025–2034, advanced by the Nuclear Power and Energy Agency (NuPEA) and announced in various public forums.
They demanded that the Government must halt any further advancement of the nuclear power program until the concerns raised herein are adequately and transparently addressed.
In a letter to various government ministries and committees of the National Assembly, they said the first sites for the plant were rejected by locals after lack of public participation and the inherent dangers from a nuclear plant.
“The sustained advocacy, supported by independent legal analysis from the University of Essex Human Rights Centre Clinic and a science-based review of the Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment (SESA) by the Öko-Institut on behalf of CJGEA, identified critical gaps in public participation, access to information, environmental assessment, and constitutional compliance that remain wholly unresolved,” they wrote.
The group’s interim chairman, Prof George Odera, said the sudden designation of a new preferred site at Lwanda K’Otieno in Rarieda Constituency, Siaya County, on the shores of Lake Victoria does not cure those aforementioned failures.
“In fact, it compounds them, extending the same unacceptable process to a new community that has been given even less notice, less information, and no genuine opportunity for consent,” he said.
Odera said communities in the Lake Victoria region, and other national and regional stakeholders, have received no meaningful consultation whatsoever, contrary to Article 35 on the Right to Access Information.
Prof Odera said NuPEA has failed to provide the community with information on the proposed plant, which negates the right to access information as contained in the Access to Information Act 2016.
“There has been no information on the upcoming nuclear plant in Siaya, and this pattern of denying access to information constitutes a clear breach of Article 35 and the Access to Information Act 2016,” he said.
He said any forceful displacement of the lakeside community without prior engagement would be a violation of rights and the Constitution.
“Any displacement of lakeside communities for nuclear infrastructure without full, prior and meaningful community engagement would violate Article 40,” he said.
“Any decision affecting the Lake Victoria region must respect county and community authority and not be imposed from the centre without genuine consent,” he said.
He said Siaya County has an operative County Integrated Development Plan (CIDP) 2023–2027, anchored on an agriculture-led development model focused on food and nutrition security, fisheries expansion, and investment in the blue economy of Lake Victoria.
“The Siaya County Spatial Plan formally designates the Lake Victoria lakefront (including Rarieda Constituency) as an exclusive Tourism Promotion Zone with a 5km inland buffer for ecotourism, marinas, lodges and water sports, and as a Fisheries Development Zone for the development of fish landing beaches and aquaculture.
A nuclear power plant is not a permitted or compatible use under either designation. Furthermore, the Spatial Plan’s energy strategy identifies solar, wind, biogas and small hydropower as the county’s energy development pathways, with no reference whatsoever to nuclear energy,” he said.
He said the CIDP or the Spatial Plan has no provision for a nuclear power facility at any location within Siaya County.
“Imposing a nuclear plant without alignment with these duly adopted county planning instruments is a direct violation of the Objects of Devolution and an affront to the county’s constitutionally protected right to determine its own development trajectory,” he said.
He said the Integrated National Energy Plan Regulations 2025 by the Ministry of Energy and Petroleum now require every county government to establish a County Energy Planning Committee and prepare county energy plans aligned with the Integrated National Energy Plan (INEP).
“No county energy plan for Siaya or any other lakeside county has incorporated nuclear energy as a component, nor have communities been meaningfully consulted on such inclusion.
A nationally imposed nuclear siting decision that bypasses these newly established county energy planning processes is fundamentally inconsistent with both the letter and spirit of devolution and the 2025 energy planning regulatory framework,” he said.
He said Kenya was a signatory to the Protocol for Sustainable Development of the Lake Victoria Basin, which establishes a regional legal framework for the joint management of Lake Victoria as a shared natural resource with social, economic and cultural significance for several Partner States of the East African Community.
“The development of a nuclear power plant in close proximity to Lake Victoria has serious potential ramifications given the attendant risks we have already highlighted.
Yet the decision to develop the proposed nuclear facility has been made without any formal notification to EAC Partner States,” he said.
He said Lake Victoria supports one of the most productive freshwater fisheries on the continent.
“The fishing industry provides direct and indirect livelihoods for 1.5 million people, including fishermen, fish traders, processors, transporters, net-makers, boat builders, fuel suppliers and fish market vendors whose livelihoods are wholly dependent on the health and reputation of the fishery.
The East African Community has formally designated the Lake Victoria basin as an ‘economic growth zone,’ recognizing its status as one of the most significant regional economic assets in East Africa.
Radioactive or thermal contamination, even at levels deemed ‘safe’ by regulators, poses an unacceptable risk to fish stocks, fishing communities and regional food security,” he said.
The group said the mere association of Lake Victoria with a nearby nuclear facility will trigger severe market stigmatization of its fish.
“International buyers, national urban markets and export partners will avoid or discount Lake Victoria fish products on the basis of perceived contamination risk, devastating an already vulnerable fishing economy even before any actual contamination is proven, thereby undermining the area’s economic mainstay,” he said.
“Lake Victoria serves as a primary drinking water source for lakeside communities and nearby urban populations.
Agriculture and irrigation: communities in the Lake Victoria basin rely on the lake and its feeder rivers for irrigation.
Contamination of the lake or its tributaries whether through radioactive leachate, thermal discharge, chemical effluents or accidental release of cooling water additives would devastate smallholder farmers and undermine food sovereignty,” he said.
He said the Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment (SESA) contains no inventory of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), Important Bird Areas, or endemic species in the nuclear impact zone.
Kenya is a signatory to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Under the CBD, Kenya has committed to protect its biodiversity, prevent species extinction, and integrate biodiversity considerations into sectoral planning, including in the energy sector, to avoid damaging ecologically sensitive areas.
No such assessment has been conducted for the proposed Lwanda K’Otieno site.
Already, the Luo and Luhya Council of Elders have rejected the project and the drum of objection grows louder.
They said a full cost-benefit analysis of the nuclear program must be published, including projected costs against alternative renewable energy investment scenarios, and must be subjected to parliamentary scrutiny and public comment.
They also demanded transboundary notification.
“The Government must formally notify Uganda, Tanzania, and other potentially affected Nile Basin states of the nuclear program and conduct transboundary consultations before any site in the Lake Victoria catchment is advanced,” they said.
Recently, the Luo and Luhya Council of Elders rejected the proposed nuclear construction and the drums of objection are growing louder day by day.
Siaya Governor James Orengo last week met with Prof Larry Gumbe and the board who paid him a courtesy call in his office.













